<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>RLV and Space Transport News</title>
    <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/</link>
    <description>News on space transport and the entrepreneurial space industry</description>
    <!-- optional tags -->
    <language>en-us</language>           <!-- valid langugae goes here -->
    <generator>Nucleus CMS v3.51</generator>
    <copyright>©</copyright>             <!-- Copyright notice -->
    <category>Weblog</category>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    
    <item>
 <title><![CDATA[Briefs: Clearly different destinations; Space policy round-up]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19349</link>
<description><![CDATA[The title of this article is misleading in a rather humorous way. Most of the panelists had clear but different destinations in mind.  Lester Lyles, in fact, was ambiguous in that he was "a little bit concerned" about the lack of a specific destination but thought NASA could "produce useful technologies even without a firm destination": <a HREF="http://www.space.com/news/manned-space-program-future-debate-100316.html" target="_d">NASA Needs a Clear Destination for Space Exploration, Experts Say - SPACE.com</A><br />
===<br />
More space policy items:<br />
/-- <a HREF="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/16/briefly-noted-kosmas-parker-and-the-gao/" target="_d">Briefly noted: Kosmas, Parker, and the GAO - Space Politics</A><br />
/-- <a HREF="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/os-ed-florida-space-strategy-031210-20100315,0,2582101.story" target="_d">Orlando Editorial: Ramp up space effort - OrlandoSentinel.com</A><br />
/-- <a HREF="http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_space_thewritestuff/2010/03/florida-leaders-pow-wow-in-d-c-on-nasa-policy.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+news%2Fspace%2Fspace_blog+%28Space+Blog+The+Write+Stuff%29&utm_content=Bloglines" target="_d">Florida leaders pow-wow in D.C. on NASA policy - The Write Stuff/Orlando Sentinel </A>.<br />
/-- <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/hyperbola/2010/03/obamas-death-panel-for-constel.html" target="_d">Obama's death panel for Constellation sees costs spiral - Hyperbola</a><br />
]]></description>
 <category>Space policy</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19349</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:33:09 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Charles Bolden address at Satellite 2010]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19347</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jeff Foust is attending the <a HREF="http://www.satellitetoday.com/satellite2010/" target="_d"><i>Satellite 2010</i></A> conference in National Harbor, Maryland today and is posting comments on <a href="http://twitter.com/jeff_foust" target="_d">his Twitter page</a>. Charles Bolden gave a luncheon talk and Jeff's notes include:<br />
/-- Constellation, he argued, should not be seen as the symbol of what the US can do in spaceflight. We can do better.<br />
/-- New plan allows us to utilize ISS, develop commercial capabilities and technologies needed for sustainable exploration beyond LEO. <br />
/-- Bolden: not true there is no destination in new plan; the ultimate destination is Mars but we need to develop the tech to get there.<br />
/-- <b>Bolden: unfair to say comm'l space transportation capabilities "untried and untested": tell that to American workers who build Atlas 5.</b> [My emphasis]<br />
/-- Bolden: comm'l crew will give us redundant, "made in America" capbilities. Don't want to be dependent on Soyuz for next decade. <br />
/-- Bolden also said safety was important for comm'l crew: he won't allow anything to go forward that he considers unsafe.<br />
/-- He said wants comm'l sector to take over access to LEO, even eventually management of ISS; NASA should not be in ops business.<br />
<br />
Other Twitter notes from the conference can be found at <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23satellite2010">twitter.com/#search?q=#satellite2010</a>]]></description>
 <category>Space policy</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19347</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:19:56 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[New Mexico space liability legislation]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19345</link>
<description><![CDATA[An article about spaceport development and the spaceflight liability protection legislation recently enacted in New Mexico: <a HREF="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9EF4OS00.htm" target="_d">New Mexico spaceport clears legislative hurdle - BusinessWeek</A> (via <a href="http://spacetoday.net" target="_d">spacetoday.net</a>).]]></description>
 <category>Spaceports</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19345</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:15:52 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Orbital Sciences Taurus II/Cygnus]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19343</link>
<description><![CDATA[Here's an update on development at Orbital Sciences of the <a href="http://www.orbital.com/TaurusII/" target="_d">Taurus II/Cygnus</a> system for cargo delivery to the ISS: <a HREF="http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/orbital-sciences-new-spaceship-100316.html" target="_d"> New Private Space Freighter Has Solid Backing - SPACE.com</A>.]]></description>
 <category>Commercial ISS Resupply</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19343</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:11:26 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Briefs: SpaceX update; Loral deal; SpaceX & com space]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19341</link>
<description><![CDATA[SpaceX has posted <a HREF="http://spacex.com/updates.php" target="_d">an update</A> about the pad test firing and includes the <a href="http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=19279" class="linkLocal">pictures</a> and <a href="http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=19287" class="linkLocal">videos</a> seen here earlier. The text also includes this, <blockquote>This was the final step for the rocket and launch pad before launch itself. We are now waiting for completion of the final set of tests of the flight termination system, specifically the explosives and initiators, and the acceptance of that test documentation by Air Force range safety. As soon as the tests are complete and the Air Force has signed off, we will move forward with launch.<br />
<br />
If all goes as hoped, the first countdown attempt may be as soon as next month. It's important to note this is not a prediction of when we will launch, just when we will probably try a countdown. Additional images of SpaceX's successful Falcon 9 static fire below—stay tuned for more updates as we continue to progress towards the first flight of Falcon 9/Dragon.</blockquote>===<br />
The Wall Street Journal notes <a href="http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=19305" class="linkLocal">yesterday's announcement</a> about the SpaceX agreement with Space Systems/Loral to launch a communications satellite in 2012: <a HREF="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703909804575124772932031294.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews" target="_d">SpaceX Rocket to Carry Loral Satellite - WSJ.com</A>.<br />
===<br />
Casey Kazan comments on developments at SpaceX : <a HREF="http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/8Jxdyt/www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/03/-spacex-poised-for-historic-launch.html/r:t" target="_d">SpaceX Poised for Historic Launch - Does It Signal the Birth of a New Commercial Space Era? - Daily Galaxy</A>]]></description>
 <category>Transport Companies</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19341</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:09:16 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Briefs: A report from Michoud; John Shannon on Shuttle extension]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19339</link>
<description><![CDATA[T. L. James reports on a visit to NASA's <a href="http://maf.msfc.nasa.gov/" target="_d">Michoud Assembly Facility</a> where the Shuttle External Tanks were built: <a href="http://marsblog.net/wp/2010/03/not-much-opportunity-for-shuttle-extension/" target="_d">Not Much Opportunity for Shuttle Extension | MarsBlog.net</a>.<blockquote>What impressed me the most, however, was that for the first time in twelve-plus years, I saw areas of the factory with the lights turned off.<br />
<br />
What this suggests is that there isn’t any hardware work going on to extend the Shuttle program beyond the number of tanks currently on-hand or in final assembly. </blockquote>===<br />
<a href="http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2010/03/can-space-shuttle-fly-beyond-2010.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Spaceports+%28Spaceports%29&amp;utm_content=Bloglines" target="_d">Spaceports blog points</a> to this video of Shuttle program manager John Shannon discussing the issue of extending the Shuttle program:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NhRj_6gtG0w&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NhRj_6gtG0w&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></div><br />
]]></description>
 <category>Space Shuttle</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19339</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:40:15 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Briefs: Enterprise preps for flight; Discovery preps for launch]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19337</link>
<description><![CDATA[Robert Pearlman writes about preparations for flying Enterprise from Smithsonian's Udvar-Hazy Center to some other museum after the Smithsonian receives the Shuttle Discovery when it retires: <a HREF="http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-031510a.html" target="_d">NASA readies retired test shuttle Enterprise for one last flight - collectSpace - Mar.15.10</A><br />
===<br />
Meanwhile, Discovery is still in active duty. Here are some updates on the status of preparations for its launch, currently scheduled for April 5th:<br />
/-- <a href="http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts131/100315valve/" target="_d">STS-131 Shuttle Report | More testing planned on shuttle Discovery problem - Spaceflight Now - Mar.15.10</a><br />
/-- <a href="http://flametrench.flatoday.net/2010/03/nasa-sets-tests-for-discovery-maintains.html" target="_d">NASA Sets Tests For Discovery & Maintains Aim For April 5 Launch - The Flame Trench/Florida Today - Mar.15.10</a><br />
]]></description>
 <category>Space Shuttle</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19337</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:23:52 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Near Space diving]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19335</link>
<description><![CDATA[An article about the <a HREF="http://www.redbullstratos.com/" target="_d">Red Bull Stratos</A> project and <a HREF="http://www.felixbaumgartner.com/" target="_d">Fekix Baumgartner</A>, who will attempt to break <a href="http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Explorers_Record_Setters_and_Daredevils/Kittinger/EX31.htm" target="_d">Joe Kittinger</a>'s  sky-diving records for altitude and speed : <a HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/science/16tier.html?ref=science" target="_d">Findings - Chasing the Sound Barrier, in a Leap From 23 Miles Up - NYTimes.com - Mar.15.10</A>.]]></description>
 <category>Near Space</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19335</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:59:40 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Briefs: Satellite industry update; Phobos in the spotlight]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19333</link>
<description><![CDATA[The communications satellite industry sure goes through frequentups and downs. Seems strange that it's now in an up while the overall global economy is still weak: <a HREF="http://spacenews.com/satellite_telecom/100315-satellite-industry-performance-pleases-wall-street.html" target="_d">Satellite Industry Performance Pleases Wall Street - SpaceNews.com</A>.<br />
===<br />
Alan Boyle reports on new high res images of Phobos and on plans to explore with unmanned and manned missions: <a HREF="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2010/03/15/2228444.aspx" target="_d">Martian moon in spotlight - Cosmic Log/msnbc.com</A>]]></description>
 <category>General</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19333</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:48:59 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title><![CDATA[Briefs: Transitioning the workforce; Constellation hangover]]></title>
 <link>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19331</link>
<description><![CDATA[Some thoughts and suggestions about how to handle the loss of jobs with the end of the Shuttle program: <a HREF="http://chairforceengineer.blogspot.com/2010/03/preventing-giant-sucking-sound.html" target="_d">Preventing the Giant Sucking Sound - Chair Force Engineer</A><blockquote>I don't know what currently exists for helping members of the shuttle workforce to find employment, but NASA really needs a "Shuttle Transition Office" that has a high priority within the agency. Such an office would work closely with SpaceX, ULA, Sierra Nevada Corp, Bigelow Aerospace and everybody else in the newspace arena to encourage maximum reuse of existing shuttle facilities (the Vehicle Assembly Building at the cape and Michould Assembly Facility come to mind,) and maximum use of shuttle program employees in NewSpace programs.</blockquote>===<br />
One might think that after the tasks of supporting the Air Force, feeding contractors and bolstering the NASA centers, getting people to space was the lowest priority for Constellation. (Getting them there at a reasonable cost certainly had no priority at all.):<br />
/-- <a HREF="http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1003/15eelvcosts/" target="_d">Air Force says Constellation cuts could raise launch costs - Spaceflight Now</A><br />
/-- <a HREF="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/asd/2010/03/15/15.xml&headline=NASA:%20Ending%20Constellation%20Will%20Cost%20More&channel=space" target="_d">NASA: Ending Constellation Will Cost More - Aviation Week</A>]]></description>
 <category>Space policy</category>
<comments>http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/?itemid=19331</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:42:37 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>