Skip to main content.
Space colony art: Don Davis


Mars Society Conf.
Dayton, OH
Aug. 5-8, 2010

SpaceUP DC
unconference
Washington, DC
Aug. 27-28, 2010

International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight (ISPCS 2010)
Las Cruces, NM
Oct. 19-21, 2010

Puerto Rico Space Congress
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Oct. 24-27, 2010

Commercial and Government Responsive Access to Space Technology Exchange (CRASTE)
Mountainview, CA
Oct. 26-29, 2010

Space Manufacturing
Critical Technologies for Space Settlement

NASA Ames
Mountain View, CA
Oct.30-31, 2010

2nd Int. IAA Conf. on Private Human Access to Space
Arcachon, France
May 30-June 1, 2011

Tip Jar
Regular readers can support HobbySpace
with a contribution via credit card:

Notes: Space Access'09: Saturday afternoon - Part 2

Jim Muncy, Mind the Space Gap
- Reviews initial plans for CEV ("Orion") in 2005
- Admiral Steidle - proposed non-traditional approach using commercial suppliers of crew launch services.
- When Mike Griffin arrived, getting rid of the Gap became the top priority.
- Gap = no NASA crew capability between 2010-2014.
-- Hailed as a national security threat.
- Led to Gemini on Steroids. (Calling Apollo is inappropriate.)
- "Some doubted hysteria"
--- Had been understood for some time that Shuttle retirement would lead to a gap.
--- Isn't the goal affordable, sustainable spaceflight?
- Smartest guys in the room
--- Killed ISS research
--- Seen as NASA's one opportunity to develop a new transport system that could go to Moon and Mars.
--- Was not designed for affordable spacefaring. It was designed to go to Mars.
- Results:
--- Internal schedules show 2017 as probable first launch of a crew with Ares I/Orion
--- $44B to Initial operating condition (IOC)
--- Gap has grown by 3 years since VSE announced.
--- Growing by 1.3 years per year
- Not much chance for new exploration.
--- No chance NASA gets to the Moon by 2019.
--- Deep space exploration appropriate mission for NASA.
--- Lucky to get there by 2029 if ever.
--- It won't be affordable or sustainable.
--- NASA has betrayed a third presidential goal for human space flight.
- Despite current high spending in DC, little chance that lots more money thrown at NASA.
- NASA has failed by its own standard
--- It has not closed the gap, it has instead increased the gap from 2 to 6-7 years.
- With new administration, an opportunity for change.
--- fastest, surest, safest, etc argument is to use existing vehicles, e.g. EELVs
- The Campaign:
--- Time to declare Ares A and ESAS a failure
--- NASA should use stimulus funds for COTS D
--- Launch Orion on EELV
--- Pursue "cheapest" medium-heavy option for exploration missions and intermodal demos
--- Orion needs massive LAS to get away as fast as possible from the solid rocket booster.
--- When that mass included, arguments about lack of EELV payload capability are not viable.
--- NASA should get back into exploration.
Q&A:
- Asking people to get involved with the Foundation and push this campaign.
- Believes this administration really wants to change NASA direction.
- Made a mistake in initially backing Griffin.
- Isakowitz selection would have been great but unfortunately blocked.
- Support for status quo is weak.
- Not yet a policy guideline on SFF website.
===

Frank Marco Günzel, Peer Gehrmann, Project Enterprise
- Overview of the project. Swiss - German collaboration.
- Shows video available on their homepage.
- Black Sky pathfinder vehicle would be on scale of Lynx
- Initially planned to use 3km long runway at Magdeburg in East Germany.
- May use Peenemünde airfield as well.
- Using radio controlled models this year. Test control and stabilization systems.
- Hard part is to get funding.
- Regulatory system, certification process, etc. are difficult to deal with.
- Calling vehicle experimental allows for some room
- Expect rides on Black Sky to cost Euro 30k. Max alt is 45km.
- Shows video of engine tests at SPL.
Q&A:
- Don't know how long or how expensive the certification process would be.
- No passengers when under experimental operation.
===

Paul Breed and son, Ben Brockert, John Carmack, Dave Masten, Keith Stormo, Bob Steinke, Scott Zeeb, Todd Squires, Bob Noteboom, Allen Newcomb, Lunar Lander Challenge panel
- Steinke:
--- Set out to avoid R&D.
--- General Kinetics engine not really available. Would have been an R&D project
- Carmack:
--- Lightweight shouldn't be the primary issue, especially early on. Optimize later.
--- 4 engines like Masten was just too hard.
--- Too many things can go wrong. Take forever to start flying. Always testing.
- Dave Masten - Believe testing can be finite. Limit to four engines.
- Carmack - Advice about tether operations. Avoiding damage on a bad day.
- Breed:
--- Hardware is just half of the problem.
--- Software needed for control system is major project.
--- Develop an analog to test it.
- Survey of LLC plans:
-- Bonnova - will to compete in Level I and II this year
-- Steinke - not this year
-- TrueZer0 - not this year
-- Zeeb - Ask in a couple of months. Depends on funding.
-- Masten - will depend on status of vehicle.
-- Carmack:
-- Make attempt soon after window opens. Will go after Level II. Not going after Level I, second place.
-- Remember that nobody has Level I wrapped up. Just as with Armadillo in 2006-2007, problems can arise that prevent the favorite from winning.
- Armadillo had done many flights prior to competition yet still didn't win in those years.
- Breed - expect to go after Level I with Blue Ball. Not sure if they can have a Level II vehicle ready.
- Carmack:
-- Talks about materials
-- Graphite gave problems at high pressure
-- Newcomb said they have been able to use it OK so far.
- Breed - press and judges are considered Involved group, not uninvolved.
- Caramack - Landing gear is not such a big issue. Bottom of tank is strongest element on the vehicle.
- Zeeb - spare vehicles are crucial.
- Steve Landeene in audience says they will try to put in some pads at Spaceport America prior to window opening.
- Plans after competition:
-- Newcomb - would like to continue building rockets if there is a market
-- Zeeb - work with universities on some projects together
-- Carmack - lots of plans of all sorts. Discussions with funding partners. If win Level II, the purse will fund some interesting work regardless of partnerships. Turned a corner into becoming a real company. In something this, need to expect to go for the long term. Didn't think it would take 8 years to get to this point.
-- Brockert - all plans end in going to space.
-- Breed - long term goal is to reach breakeven, which would allow long term development.
- Carmack: LLC has been a super success for NASA. Really encouraged involvement of a lot of people and more groups that expected. Trained many people in rocket building.
- Carmack - with full time employees now, he is actually spending less time on Armadillo than before.
- Breed - orbiting a 100g payload would be the ultimate success. Bring space access to the common man.
- Brockert - Seeing videos as a kid of DC-X hovering was the coolest thing he'd seen and is amazed he is now working on such a project.
- Breed - At last year's LLC event, it was speculated that flights would take place at home fields in 2009 but not officially stated yet.
===

Henry Vanderbilt wraps up another Space Access Society meeting.

Comments

No comments yet
Add Comment

Note: HTML code will not work except for bare URLs (i.e. http://www...). Also, for postings older than 1 week, comments are filtered manually to prevent spam and so may not appear for a few days.
Note: Trash talking and name calling, especially in anonymous comments, won't be tolerated.



wholesale
Best Aviation Jobs
Computer Help
Credit Cards
Customer Satisfaction Survey
Dish Network
Home Security
Industrial Brushes
Kamagra tablets
Metal Spinning
Metal Stampings Co
Physics Homework
Promotional Pens
Promotional Products
Satellite Broadband
Satellite Internet
Slimming Supplements
Source China Products

Blog Search

Google
Web
HobbySpace