Briefs: WSJ op-ed on private spaceflight; NASA resolutions
One reason for Rocketplane's failure was reportedly investor skepticism about whether NASA, with its cost-plus mentality and pork-barreling Congressional oversight, really wants to encourage a cheap private alternative.[Update: As Rand Sam says, kudos go to space advocate Charles Lurio, who is cited in the essay, for "beating the drum for rationalizing space policy for years".]
That's a cloud that will hang over the entire human spaceflight industry as long as NASA insists on spending taxpayer money on the in-house, do-it-all approach that has produced little real progress since Apollo. The next president should turn NASA into a buyer of services rather than a producer of them, much as the government once used mail contracts to boost the early commercial aviation industry. Only by breaking the classic NASA mold can we speed up a permanent human presence in space, thus ensuring humanity's long-term survival.
===
The Chair Force Engineer also offers some suggestions for the space agency: A New Years' Resolution for NASA - CFE - Dec.31.07.


Comments
Note: HTML code will not work except for bare URLs (i.e. http://www...). Also, for postings older than 1 week, comments are filtered manually to prevent spam and so may not appear for a few days.
Note: Trash talking and name calling, especially in anonymous comments, won't be tolerated.