Skip to main content.
Space colony art: Don Davis


13th Annual FAA Commercial Space Transportation Conference
Arlington, VA
February 10-11, 2010

Next-Generation Suborbital Researchers Conference
(NSRC 2010)

Boulder, CO
Feb. 18-20, 2010

Next Generation Exploration Conf
NASA Ames, CA
April 5-8, 2010

Space Access '010
Phoenix AZ
April 8-10, 2010

NSS ISDC 2010
Chicago, IL
May 27-31, 2010

New Space 2010
NASA Ames, CA
July 23-25, 2010

Tip Jar
Regular readers can support HobbySpace
with a contribution via credit card:

Briefs: SpaceX in Florida; A Mars transport plan; Commercial space trans conference

Florida Today adds two articles about SpaceX to its series on life after the Shuttles retire :
* After the shuttle: Filling the gap: Company's founder, whose rockets may be launched from Cape Canaveral, could hire part of the out-of-work shuttle staff
* The SpaceX factor is key : Startup company likely to have an impact in Brevard County
===
Mr. X examines a study (pdf) by Spaceworks Engineering into using elements of NASA's Constellation program (i.e. Ares 1, Ares V, etc) to create a architecture capable of carrying out a three person mission to Mars in the 2030-2040 time frame : Marching to Mars - Chair Force Engineer - Nov.18.07
===
The Office of FAA Commercial Space Transportation announces that the 11th Annual FAA Commercial Space Transportation Conference "Roadmap to 2015", will take place on February 5-6, 2008 at the Doubletree Hotel, Crystal City, Virginia. (Via Space Law Probe).

Comments

From the first link

>SpaceX intends to launch from pad 40 at >Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and says >it might employ 1,000 workers at a time >when a few thousand ex-shuttle workers >will be looking for new jobs.

1000 workers on the pad? That does not
sound like a mammal. Even as a total
headcount for SpaceX it would be high.

Posted by nnn at 11/19/07 10:58:12

I have to agree with mr X on that mars mission Spaceworks put together but not for the same reasons.
It was pretty laughable and brain dead doesn't even make use of propulsion breakthroughs that have happened during the past 30 years.
To even consider an all chemical manned mars mission now days is just stupid "it's been stupid since the first nuclear thermo rockets were designed "given the options such as vasimr and how much faster and safer these options are.

Posted by Ruri at 11/20/07 10:13:11

Sadly, this isn't just a matter of technology. Do you want to get to Mars, or do you want to fight the fight that comes when nuclear (the other N-word, to some, in that reason and rationality dissappear when used) power is suggested?

You may not be able to do both. Even open-air testing of a new nuclear-thermal rocket will be a very tough sell...

Posted by Frank Glover at 11/20/07 15:07:30
Add Comment

Note: HTML code will not work except for bare URLs (i.e. http://www...). Also, for postings older than 1 week, comments are filtered manually to prevent spam and so may not appear for a few days.
Note: Trash talking and name calling, especially in anonymous comments, won't be tolerated.



More Sponsors
Auto Transport
Best Aviation Jobs
Computer Help
Dish Network
Home Security
Metal Spinning
Metal Stampings Co
Promotional Pens
Promotional Products
Satellite Broadband
Satellite Internet
Survey Your Customers

Blog Search

Google
Web
HobbySpace