Skip to main content.
Space colony art: Don Davis


Mars Society Conf.
Dayton, OH
Aug. 5-8, 2010

SpaceUP DC
unconference
Washington, DC
Aug. 27-28, 2010

International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight (ISPCS 2010)
Las Cruces, NM
Oct. 19-21, 2010

Puerto Rico Space Congress
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Oct. 24-27, 2010

Commercial and Government Responsive Access to Space Technology Exchange (CRASTE)
Mountainview, CA
Oct. 26-29, 2010

Space Manufacturing
Critical Technologies for Space Settlement

NASA Ames
Mountain View, CA
Oct.30-31, 2010

2nd Int. IAA Conf. on Private Human Access to Space
Arcachon, France
May 30-June 1, 2011

Tip Jar
Regular readers can support HobbySpace
with a contribution via credit card:

Comments

This makes a lot more sense to me than the earlier talk of solid rocket prices "doubling":

"During a Senate Armed Services strategic forces subcommittee hearing, Rear Adm. Stephen Johnson, said he expects solid rocket motor prices to rise 10 to 20 percent. He assured Vitter that 100 percent price growth is not likely. Johnson heads Navy strategic systems programs. ... NASA's requirements are so different from the military's - think size and weight - that eliminating NASA's demand will not cause military rocket costs to double."

Meanwhile, NASA will be using the under-capacity EELVs a lot more, which will help the EELV users. NASA will also use and enable other rockets the military can use. NASA will upgrade the Florida launch range for commercial rockets, presenting the DoD with more options there (perhaps including more EELV processing lines to give DoD more flexibility. This is important - even though the EELVs are way under capacity, recent EELV issues and payload delays have caused big bottlenecks for DoD EELV use recently).

At the same time, NASA will be doing numerous technology demonstrations and a lot of space technology research. Much of this will help the military: smallsats, satellite servicing, depots, high-speed communications, reusable suborbital RLV use, light-weight materials, in-space propulsion, etc.

NASA's increased Earth observation budget will indirectly help the industrial base for similar DoD and intelligence satellites.

Developing an American-made, modernized and cost-effective RD-180 class engine would be quite useful for the DoD. That's in the NASA budget.

Posted by red at 03/18/10 05:48:41
Add Comment

Note: HTML code will not work except for bare URLs (i.e. http://www...). Also, for postings older than 1 week, comments are filtered manually to prevent spam and so may not appear for a few days.
Note: Trash talking and name calling, especially in anonymous comments, won't be tolerated.



wholesale
Best Aviation Jobs
Computer Help
Credit Cards
Customer Satisfaction Survey
Dish Network
Home Security
Industrial Brushes
Kamagra tablets
Metal Spinning
Metal Stampings Co
Physics Homework
Promotional Pens
Promotional Products
Satellite Broadband
Satellite Internet
Slimming Supplements
Source China Products

Blog Search

Google
Web
HobbySpace