Skip to main content.
Space colony art: Don Davis


Mars Society Conf.
Dayton, OH
Aug. 5-8, 2010

SpaceUP DC
unconference
Washington, DC
Aug. 27-28, 2010

International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight (ISPCS 2010)
Las Cruces, NM
Oct. 19-21, 2010

Puerto Rico Space Congress
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Oct. 24-27, 2010

Commercial and Government Responsive Access to Space Technology Exchange (CRASTE)
Mountainview, CA
Oct. 26-29, 2010

Space Manufacturing
Critical Technologies for Space Settlement

NASA Ames
Mountain View, CA
Oct.30-31, 2010

2nd Int. IAA Conf. on Private Human Access to Space
Arcachon, France
May 30-June 1, 2011

Tip Jar
Regular readers can support HobbySpace
with a contribution via credit card:

NASA estimate of Ares I test requirements

Even Griffin's ESAS report said Ares I/Orion would need at least seven flights before its calculated safety level exceeds that of the Shuttles: First flights of NASA's Ares rocket: less safe than space shuttle? - The Write Stuff/Orlando Sentinel.

Of course, the Shuttle program needed 113 flights to illuminate two major flaws in that system.

Comments

"the Shuttle program needed 113 flights to illuminate two major flaws in that system."

unfortunately I think the truth is even worse. the flaws were known before those fatal flights....

so it didn't take X flights to illuminate the flaws... it took X flights for astronauts to die and external obligation forced NASA into a minimal required change. last I heard both accident reports blamed NASA culture and the culture still wasn't fixed.

Posted by donnie at 12/01/09 21:48:01

Not only did even I know about the O-ring wear problems before STS51L but NASA was already into a multi-million $ program to find a fix. There problem was two-fold: continuing to fly in the meantime and then Flying of the coldest day in the experience envelope.

As far as Columbia is concerned, there are hundreds of dings on the TPS on each flight. It was inevitable that one day something worse than 'usual' would occur. Non of the changes NASA has implemented since would have saved that crew...only being docked on ISS until rescue would work,

What a stupid idea to use one shuttle to rescue another! The replacement should be grounded tor 2 years as before!

Only the Soyuz can do rescue.

Posted by Gabe Kampis at 01/23/10 03:44:50
Add Comment

Note: HTML code will not work except for bare URLs (i.e. http://www...). Also, for postings older than 1 week, comments are filtered manually to prevent spam and so may not appear for a few days.
Note: Trash talking and name calling, especially in anonymous comments, won't be tolerated.



wholesale
Best Aviation Jobs
Computer Help
Credit Cards
Customer Satisfaction Survey
Dish Network
Home Security
Industrial Brushes
Kamagra tablets
Metal Spinning
Metal Stampings Co
Physics Homework
Promotional Pens
Promotional Products
Satellite Broadband
Satellite Internet
Slimming Supplements
Source China Products

Blog Search

Google
Web
HobbySpace